National Assembly Futures Institute

Congressional think tank designing
national future strategies

Future Research

(24-03 National Assembly Future Agendas) Expanding the Concept of Cybersecurity and Changes in Major Countries' Strategies: Implications for South Korea’s Cybersecurity and Recommendations to the Nati
This study examines how major countries are broadening their cybersecurity strategies and considers the implications for South Korea’s Cybersecurity and the role of its National Assembly. The research employs keyword analysis and network mapping to highlight a shift from traditional focuses on information security and network defense to more comprehensive strategies. These strategies encompass supply chain security, technological and industrial capacity building, the creation of robust cybersecurity ecosystems, holistic societal engagement, and enhanced international cooperation. In response to rapidly evolving technologies and emerging threats, nations are emphasizing stronger legal enforcement and fostering ecosystems that promote public-private collaboration. Although the Republic of Korea has expanded its cybersecurity efforts to include both defensive and offensive capabilities, there remains a need to bolster institutional effectiveness by enhancing law enforcement measures and developing collaborative frameworks between the public and the private sector. As cyber threats continue to evolve, strengthening legal and institutional foundations and adopting inclusive approaches that engage businesses, academia, civil society, and individuals become increasingly important. This study underscores the crucial role of the National Assembly in enhancing the Republic of Korea’s cybersecurity readiness, calling for active political engagement and legislative action.

2024.09.13

News Release

International Semina “The Future of the International Order and the Global Economy After the U.S. Presidential Election”
National Assembly Futures Institute, Princeton University, National Assembly Global Diplomacy and Security Forum, and Advanced Diplomacy Forum Host International Seminar on “The Future of the International Order and the Global Economy After the U.S. Presidential Election” On Tuesday, October 15, the National Assembly Futures Institute, in collaboration with Princeton University’s Niehaus Center, the National Assembly Global Diplomacy and Security Forum (chaired by Yoon Jae Ok), and the Bipartisan Forum for Advanced Diplomacy (chaired by Wi Sung Rak), hosted an international seminar titled “The Future of the International Order and the Global Economy After the U.S. Presidential Election” in the 2nd Seminar Room of the National Assembly Members’ Office Building. This seminar, organized by Princeton University’s Niehaus Center, invited 22 prominent American political scientists and international political economists visiting Korea to discuss the anticipated results of the U.S. presidential election and its potential impact on the international order and the global economy. The event provided a platform for dialogue between the American scholars and Korean members of the National Assembly, academics, and experts. Cha Jungmi, Director of the International Strategy Research Center at the National Assembly Futures Institute, remarked, “With only 20 days left until the U.S. presidential election, the race is becoming increasingly unpredictable. In this heightened state of uncertainty, we have invited American political scientists well-versed in elections and the international political economy to forecast the election results and engage in a multifaceted discussion on their economic, political, and diplomatic-security implications. This event serves as a platform to prepare for the next global order.” In his welcoming remarks, Member of the National Assembly Yoon Jae Ok stated, “The crisis of the liberal international order faces complex challenges in various aspects, including politics, economy, environment, technology, leadership, and community,” and emphasized the importance of communication and cooperation. The first session focused on forecasting the results of the U.S. presidential election and congressional elections for the Senate and House of Representatives, as well as discussing the implications for U.S. politics, foreign policy direction, and the international order after the election. Moderated by Professor Jeon Jae Sung of Seoul National University, the session featured presentations by Professor Frances Lee of Princeton University and Professor Seo Jung Kun of Kyung Hee University. A panel discussion followed, with participation from Member of the National Assembly Choi Hyung Doo, Professor Nolan McCarty and Professor Yoo Hye Young of Princeton University, and Park Hyeonseok, Head of the Governance Group at the National Assembly Futures Institute. Professor Frances Lee, in her presentation, stated, “There has not been a time since 2000 when presidential, Senate, and House elections have been so fiercely contested simultaneously,” predicting that the outcomes would be decided by extremely narrow margins. She analyzed that such close election results could lead to various risks, including the potential for legal disputes, continued partisan gridlock and weakened bipartisan cooperation—what she described as the “Era of Insecure Majorities”—as well as the emergence of a “politically vulnerable president” with a narrow geographic support base. Professor Seo Jung Kun predicted that if Trump is re-elected, U.S. foreign policy is likely to center around unilateralism and non-interventionism. He analyzed the legislative impacts of policies such as the IRA and emphasized that considering the future of U.S. politics and the South Korean economy, the U.S. Congress could play a critical role in shaping the international order and U.S.-Korea relations. The second session focused on forecasting the impacts on the trade order. Moderated by Yoo Myung Hee, former Minister for Trade, the session featured presentations by Professor Leo Baccini of McGill University and Professor Lee Seung Joo of Chung-Ang University. A panel discussion followed with Helen Milner, Director of the Niehaus Center at Princeton University; Professor Stephanie Rickard of the London School of Economics; Jung Ki Chang, Head of the International Trade Team at Lee & Ko; and Cho Sung Dae, Head of the Trade Research Division at the Korea International Trade Association. Professor Leo Baccini, in his presentation, noted that “Economic uncertainty has deepened due to the slowdown in trade cooperation over the past 20 years, stagnation in trade liberalization over the past decade, the recent rise in protectionism, and the emergence of populism.” He stated that “A second Trump administration would pose challenges to global trade governance, such as implementing universal tariffs of at least 10%.” He also projected that “While Harris’s trade policy remains unclear, it is likely to follow the trajectory of the Biden administration, refraining from signing new free trade agreements, imposing security-related trade regulations on China, promoting industrial subsidies aimed at protecting labor rights and environmental standards, and introducing import measures to safeguard industries such as steel and green energy.” Professor Lee Seung Joo remarked in his presentation that “The world is now in an era of “slowbalization,” characterized by the slow pace of globalization.” He emphasized that “The outcome of the U.S. presidential election will determine whether we face Trade War 2.0 or the continuation of de-risking strategies.” The third session focused on forecasting changes in economic security and de-risking strategies. Moderated by Kim Hyun Wook, President of the Sejong Institute, the session featured presentations by Professor Kenneth Scheve of Yale University and Professor Park Jong Hee of Seoul National University. The panel discussion consisted of Professor Dustin Tingley of Harvard University, Professor Edward Mansfield of the University of Pennsylvania, Professor Bae Young Ja of Konkuk University, and Cha Jungmi, Director of the International Strategy Research Center at the National Assembly Futures Institute. Professor Kenneth Scheve, in his presentation, stated that “A second Trump administration would likely focus on promoting reshoring through tariffs and investment restrictions, offering tax benefits to specific sectors such as semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, and defense, and prioritizing oil, gas, and coal production over the IRA and green technology policies.” He added that “A Harris administration would emphasize strengthening supply chain resilience in areas such as semiconductors, artificial intelligence, quantum computing, pharmaceuticals, and green technologies. It would also aim to reduce reliance on China, diversify trade by enhancing cooperation with allies, and expand the national role in supporting the domestic economy.” He also raised the question, “Are the differences between the policies of the Harris and Trump administrations being exaggerated?” He pointed out that the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 highlighted that reshoring alone is costly, suggesting that deeper partnerships with allies, including South Korea, would be necessary to establish diversified supply chains, outlining a similar strategic approach. Professor Park Jong Hee of Seoul National University emphasized that “An inward-looking approach to economic security by the United States and its allies is insufficient to address China’s global challenges and achieve domestic goals.” He stressed the importance of “revitalizing the rules-based multilateral trade system as a critical factor for economic growth and international stability” and highlighted the need to reinvigorate the WTO. He also proposed tasks such as engaging the Global South leveraging AI. This international seminar was livestreamed on the National Assembly Futures Institute’s YouTube channel, and presentation materials are available in the announcements section of the Institute’s website.

2024.10.14

News Release

National Assembly Futures Institute Co-Hosts Seminar: "Europe and Korea in an Era of Global Crisis and Transition"
National Assembly Futures Institute Co-Hosts Seminar: "Europe and Korea in an Era of Global Crisis and Transition" Discussion on Labor Politics and Strategic Approaches to China in Europe and Korea On September 20 at 1:20 p.m., the National Assembly Futures Institute co-hosted a seminar titled “Global Crisis and the Era of Transition, Europe and Korea” in the 8th and 9th Conference Rooms of the National Assembly Members' Office Building. The event was jointly organized with the offices of Members of the National Assembly Kim Tae Sun and Kim Wi Sang, the Korean Society of Contemporary European Studies, the Institute of EU Studies and Humanities and Social Sciences Institute of Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, and EURAXESS Korea. The seminar featured discussions on the strategic approach of the EU to China, the Brussels Effect, and labor politics in Korea. At the opening ceremony, welcoming remarks were delivered by Kim Tae Sun, a member of the Democratic Party of Korea, and Kim Wi Sang, a member of the People Power Party. Congratulatory messages followed from Yoon Sung Won, President of the Korean Association of European Studies; Kim Myeon Hoe, Director of the Humanities and Social Sciences Institute at Hankuk University of Foreign Studies; and Tomasz Wierzbowski, Head of EURAXESS Korea. In the subsequent seminar, the Institute of EU Studies and the Humanities and Social Sciences Institute of Hankuk University of Foreign Studies hosted a panel discussion on the theme “The Brussels Effect and the Global Expansion of EU Regulations.” The Korean Association of European Studies held a panel discussion on “The EU and Major European Countries’ Strategic Approaches to China.” Finally, the National Assembly Futures Institute conducted a panel discussion on the theme “Korean Labor Politics: Where Are We Heading?” The seminar booklet for “Europe and Korea in an Era of Global Crisis and Transition” is available on the National Assembly Futures Institute’s website.

2024.09.19

News Release

Forum and Report Released to Commemorate the Opening of the 22nd National Assembly
Forum and Report Released to Commemorate the Opening of the 22nd National Assembly Forum Titled “The Future of Korea That the 22nd National Assembly Should Focus On” Held Report Titled “Future Agenda for Korea That the 22nd National Assembly Should Focus On” Published The National Assembly Futures Institute (President Kim Hyoen Kon) held a forum titled “The Future of Korea That the 22nd National Assembly Should Focus On” on July 26 at 9:30 a.m. in the 2nd Small Conference Room of the National Assembly Members' Office Building. The forum, titled “The Future of Korea That the 22nd National Assembly Should Focus On,” aimed to present legislative tasks and explore strategies for addressing challenges in the future society, emphasizing key future agendas that the 22nd National Assembly should prioritize. Kicking off with an opening ceremony, the event featured an opening address by Kim Hyoen Kon, President of the National Assembly Futures Institute, and a congratulatory speech by Woo Won Shik, Speaker of the National Assembly. In the second part, Professor Kim Tae Yoo, Emeritus Professor at Seoul National University, delivered a keynote speech forecasting societal changes and outlining the tasks the National Assembly must undertake to shape a better future for the country. During the discussion session moderated by Lee Kyu Yeon, President of the Korea Association for Futures Studies, participants included Cha Ji Ho, Member of the National Assembly from the Democratic Party of Korea, Yang Jae Jin, Professor of Public Administration at Yonsei University, Byun Mi Ri, Head of the Inclusive City Research Division at the Seoul Institute, Han Sung Soo, Director of the ICT Strategy Research Institute at the Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, and Park Se In, Political Reporter at Hankook Ilbo. Alongside the forum, the commemorative report for the opening of the 22nd National Assembly, titled “Future Agenda for Korea That the 22nd National Assembly Should Focus On,” was published on July 26. The report was distributed at the forum and is also available on the National Assembly Futures Institute’s website. Meanwhile, the forum titled “The Future of Korea That the 22nd National Assembly Should Focus On” was livestreamed on the National Assembly Futures Institute’s YouTube channel, and details about the forum can be found on the Institute’s website.

2024.07.24

News Release

Australian Treasury Representatives Visit the National Assembly Futures Institute
Australian Treasury Representatives Visit the National Assembly Futures Institute Discussion on Various Policy Issues Related to South Korea’s Low Birth Rates and Aging Population The National Assembly Futures Institute (President Kim Hyoen Kon) hosted Mr. Andrew Deitz, Minister-Counselor responsible for Korea and Japan at the Australian Embassy in Japan (from the Treasury Department), Ms. Katherine Twomey, First Secretary for Economic Affairs at the Australian Embassy in Korea, and Ms. Beth Rossiter, Second Secretary for Political Affairs at the Australian Embassy in Korea, for a discussion on various policy issues related to South Korea’s low birth rates and aging population. The meeting was attended by researchers from the Institute’s Quality of Life Group, led by Min Bogyeong, and proceeded in a format where the National Assembly Futures Institute addressed inquiries from the Australian Treasury regarding South Korea’s policy issues on low birth rates and aging. The Australian government representatives inquired about key aspects of South Korea's policies on low birth rates and aging, as well as the monitoring systems in place to evaluate policy implementation outcomes, encompassing the overall strategies for addressing an aging society. They also sought the opinions of researchers at the National Assembly Futures Institute on the primary causes of declining birth rates in South Korea and the reasons for the low effectiveness of policies, despite continued efforts. In addition, they asked about time-series changes in the population structure and results from national surveys on fertility intentions to gain insights into South Korea’s future population projections. Assistant Research Fellow Min Bogyeong provided detailed responses regarding regional population changes caused by aging and corresponding policy measures. Assistant Research Fellows Ahn Suzie and Lee Chae Jung provided detailed responses, respectively focusing on low birth rate policies and aging-related policies, drawing on relevant studies conducted by the National Assembly Futures Institute. Following discussions on specific policy details, both sides exchanged opinions on the necessity of policy efforts to adapt to overall changes in population structure.

2024.05.29

News Release

Visit of Citizens and Grand Challenges Research Team to the National Assembly Futures Institute
Visit of Citizens and Grand Challenges Research Team to the National Assembly Futures Institute Sharing Key research of the National Assembly Futures Institute and Exchanging Diverse Perspectives on Future Studies The National Assembly Futures Institute (President Kim Hyoen Kon) hosted the Citizens and Grand Challenges (hereinafter referred to as “CGC”) research team, providing an opportunity to share key research achievements and exchange diverse perspectives on future studies. The CGC research team is a collaborative network involving five research institutions from four countries: the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs (KIHASA), Copenhagen Business School and Roskilde University in Denmark, University of Sussex in the UK, and Politecnico di Torino in Italy. The team focuses on studying public perceptions surrounding global environmental changes, including issues such as migration, aging, digitalization, automation, and climate change. President Kim Hyoen Kon of the National Assembly Futures Institute, along with Yoo Heesoo, Director of the Research Support Office, and Lee Chae Jung, Assistant Research Fellow, briefed members of the CGC research team on the history of the National Assembly Futures Institute, its functions, and its roles within the National Assembly. They also introduced the Institute’s major research achievements, including the development of an indicator system for societal responses to future challenges, meta-evaluation of the government’s mid- to long-term plans, and the Korean Happiness Survey. Furthermore, they presented examples of utilizing various methods, such as public opinion polls and surveys targeting policymakers’ aides, in future-oriented research. The CGC research team is conducting surveys in 10 countries—South Korea, the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Poland—to compare public perceptions. During their visit to South Korea, they shared preliminary findings from pilot studies conducted in Denmark, Italy, and the UK. These findings analyzed the impacts of societal transformations driven by the Fourth Industrial Revolution, such as the digital revolution, on welfare systems, the relationship between work and welfare, and the working poor. The CGC research team and the National Assembly Futures Institute emphasized that both organizations serve as exemplary cases of research institutions addressing major future societal issues, such as aging, automation, digitalization, and climate change, from a multidisciplinary perspective—examples that other nations could look to as models in preparing for the future. Additionally, they highlighted the need for follow-up studies to conduct in-depth analyses of the ongoing survey results, which encompass 22,000 participants across 10 countries, as well as the necessity for collaborative research utilizing the accumulated data. The National Assembly Futures Institute and the CGC research team discussed the importance of exploring ways to promote continued exchange and cooperation between the two organizations.

2024.03.29

Research Report

(24-03 National Assembly Future Agendas) Expanding the Concept of Cybersecurity and Changes in Major Countries' Strategies: Implications for South Korea’s Cybersecurity and Recommendations to the Nati
P.I : Cha Jung-mi

This study examines how major countries are broadening their cybersecurity strategies and considers the implications for South Korea’s Cybersecurity and the role of its National Assembly. The research employs keyword analysis and network mapping to highlight a shift from traditional focuses on information security and network defense to more comprehensive strategies. These strategies encompass supply chain security, technological and industrial capacity building, the creation of robust cybersecurity ecosystems, holistic societal engagement, and enhanced international cooperation. In response to rapidly evolving technologies and emerging threats, nations are emphasizing stronger legal enforcement and fostering ecosystems that promote public-private collaboration. Although the Republic of Korea has expanded its cybersecurity efforts to include both defensive and offensive capabilities, there remains a need to bolster institutional effectiveness by enhancing law enforcement measures and developing collaborative frameworks between the public and the private sector. As cyber threats continue to evolve, strengthening legal and institutional foundations and adopting inclusive approaches that engage businesses, academia, civil society, and individuals become increasingly important. This study underscores the crucial role of the National Assembly in enhancing the Republic of Korea’s cybersecurity readiness, calling for active political engagement and legislative action.

2024-09-13
(24-01 Series Report)Future Agendas of the Republic of Korea to Watch in the 22nd National Assembly
P.I : Yoo Hee-Soo

With the commencement of the 22nd National Assembly in 2024, a crucial phase of legislative activities and policy debates spanning the next four years is set to begin. This is especially the case for lawmakers, whereby they will rigorously examine a variety of perspectives to prioritize key policy initiatives for advancement during this term. It is in this period, that the growing need for impartial research outcomes to serve as a neutral foundation for policy discussions within the National Assembly is underscored. In line with the convening of the National Assembly, this study was designed to preemptively present future agendas for discussion at the 22nd National Assembly for lawmakers, catering to lawmakers and aides who serve as pivotal stakeholders in policymaking. Researchers from the National Assembly Futures Institute (NAFI) have contributed to this study, presenting mid- to long-term future agendas for deliberation in the 22nd National Assembly. These agendas are grounded in research findings accumulated through their specialized expertise. With the influx of new lawmakers and aides into the National Assembly, there is an opportunity to foster discussions from fresh perspectives alongside the established policy discourse. Consequently, this study proactively introduces novel perspectives and distinctive policy proposals, transcending the confines of existing frameworks.

2024-07-26
(National Assembly Collaborative)Recognizing and Responding to the Paradigm of International Order: A Focus on Debates in Major Countries
P.I : Cha Jung-mi

The international order is bound to change and the current global landscape is at an inflection point for change. This report begins by questioning how major countries perceive the changes in the international order, directing attention towards which countries are politically and economically hegemonic and whether liberalism or protectionism prevails as the dominant global order. In addition, it delves into whether the paradigm of the international order will change or whether it is a temporary and partial phenomenon that does not reach the level of paradigm shift. By examining the perspectives of key international actors, this analysis will provide valuable insights for strategizing our response to these global dynamics. This report begins by embracing the concept of a paradigm in relation to the international order, positioning itself as a "Research Report on the International Order Paradigm Discussions." It attempts to analyze the views of major leaders and governments as well as the viewpoints of academics separately. In particular, to grasp the perceptions of governments and major leaders, we referenced official sources such as foreign strategy documents, white papers, foreign ministry announcements, and statements by major leaders. Nonetheless, in instances where it proved challenging to differentiate between the stances of leaders and academics, our analysis mainly focused on the "international order paradigm perception and response" of the top leaders. The report is organized as follows: an introduction, discussion of the international order paradigm within various countries, characteristics and issues of the discussion, and a conclusion. In the section on countries' discussions on the international order paradigm, the main subjects of analysis are the United States, China, Europe, Japan, and North Korea. Should this report achieve its objective of encapsulating the perspectives of major nations on the international order and formulating suitable responses for Korea, it will prove to be an invaluable resource for legislators in their policy-making process. Our aspiration is for this report to act as a reference, delineating the stances of key countries on the evolving international landscape, marked by heightened U.S.-China tensions, yet punctuated by signs of cooperation between the two powers. * This study was conducted with National Assembly Research Service as the National Assembly Collaborative research.

2023-12-31
(National Assembly Collaborative)U.S.-China Technology Innovation Competition and the Changing International Order
P.I : Cha Jung-mi

The history of past hegemonic shifts demonstrates that technological innovation plays a role in shifting global leadership and altering the international order. In some instances, the decline of a hegemon has been attributed to its complacency regarding existing technological advantages, while in others, aggressive investment in new technological innovations and industrialization has facilitated its ascent to hegemony. The United States, having led the world in technological innovation and industrialization during the second and third industrial revolutions, has maintained its hegemonic status for over a century, despite the recurrent emergence of "hegemonic crisis" discourse. Today, the rise of China and the integration of emerging technologies such as AI are once again prompting discussions about a potential hegemonic crisis and hegemonic shift. This study delves into and projects the U.S.-China hegemonic competition through the lens of technological innovation. Drawing on Lewis Mumford's analysis of technological civilizations, this study categorizes the current phase of technological civilization as one marked by the coexistence of new technologies (digital technologies) and new ecological civilization technologies (green technologies). Reflecting this classification, the world today advocates for the "Twin Transition" as a core national strategy, aiming to advance digital transformation and green transformation simultaneously. With China's rise and changes in the global order, U.S.-China competition is intensifying around green and digital technologies, which are fundamental to today's technological civilization and national innovation strategies. This study explores the trends and future of the U.S.-China rivalry in green and digital technologies, focusing on patent data. It assesses who is leading the innovation race in green and digital technologies based on the number of patent applications, and examines and forecasts the formation of blocs within the global network of these technologies through patent family analysis method. The history of hegemony illustrates that resting on the laurels of past scientific and technological advancements can precipitate decline. Amidst the history of technological innovation, hegemonic rise and fall, the Republic of Korea must reflect on the current challenges and crises it faces. There is an imperative for Korea to contemplate its future competitiveness in technological domains that have historically underpinned its growth. Moreover, it must consider the potential risks of losing its innovative edge and experiencing a decline in status if it becomes complacent with those very technologies that have previously driven prosperity, especially in an era of disruptive technological innovation. To achieve a position of unparalleled superiority across diverse sectors, Korea must commit to long-term and audacious investments in leading-edge technologies.

2023-12-31
(National Assembly Collaborative Research Report) A Study on the Diagnosis of Problems in Renewable Energy Deployment Policies in the Power Sector and Institutional Improvement Measures
P.I : Jeong Hoon

Countries around the world are adopting renewable energy as a key means of limiting climate change and achieving carbon neutrality. Major nations are prioritizing the expansion of renewable energy to decarbonize the power sector, leading to a rapid increase in the deployment of renewable energy. Additionally, renewable energy is emerging as a means of addressing global energy crises, achieving energy security, and pre-empting new industries, thus enhancing the importance of renewable energy policies. In the Republic of Korea, there have been continuous efforts to expand renewable energy since the implementation of the energy transition policy in 2017, with the share of renewable energy in power generation increasing to 7.15% by 2021. However, despite the lower-than-average global level of renewable energy electricity generation, various problems have arisen, and limitations in the RPS(Renewable Portfolio Standard)-centered deployment system have been identified. In response, the National Assembly Futures Institute aims to compare domestic and international renewable energy trends and policy tools, diagnose problems in the domestic power sector's renewable energy deployment policy, and propose improvements for the activation of renewable energy. This involves examining international trends in renewable energy policy and institutional frameworks, as well as trends in the introduction of renewable energy deployment policy tools in the power sector. The domestic status of renewable energy deployment and power sector deployment policies and institutional frameworks were also reviewed. Following this, expert focus group interviews (FGI) were conducted to diagnose problems in domestic renewable energy policies and derive directions for improvement. Based on this, a survey was conducted among renewable energy industry stakeholders to understand their perceptions of renewable energy policies and investigate policy demands, seeking institutional improvement measures for the activation of domestic renewable energy. The following institutional measures were proposed based on these findings: ① Renewable Energy Deployment System Improvement: Transitioning the RPS system to an auction-based system and discussing detailed policy and legislative measures for this. ② Grid System Stabilization Measures: Establishing institutional and technical measures for timely construction of transmission and distribution networks, opening real-time and reserve markets, and introducing renewable energy bidding systems, with the need to expand Demand Response (DR) resources. ③ Consistency in Renewable Energy Policy: Introducing mandatory stakeholder public discourse and opinion gathering in energy policy formulation, institutionalizing a bipartisan energy agreement, and proposing measures to strengthen the National Assembly's review authority in energy policy formulation and goal setting.

2023-12-31
previous slide button
slide_pause
next slide button

Brief Report

previous slide button
slide_pause
next slide button

scroll-down